نقش منابع و کانال‌های ارتباطی - اطلاعاتی در نگرشِ مرتعداران نسبت به اصلاح و احیای مراتع (منطقه مورد مطالعه: استان کُردستان، شهرستان قُروه)

نویسندگان
فرزاد احمدی 1
حیدر میرزایی 2
احسان فتحی 3
1 فارغ‌التحصیل دکترای دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی ساری،
2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه مرتع، دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه
3 فارغ‌التحصیل گرایش آبخیزداری، دانشگاه شهرکرد
چکیده
منابع اطلاعاتی و کانال‌های ارتباطی مناسب، می‌توانند با ایفای نقش اطلاع‌رسانی و آگاهی‌دهنده، به­عنوان عامل تغییر در دانش، ادراک و نگرش افراد نقش مهمی را در اصلاح و احیای مراتع ایفا کنند. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی نقش منابع و کانال­های ارتباطی در نگرشِ مرتعداران نسبت به اصلاح و احیای مراتع در شهرستان قُروه بود. جامعه آماری 400 نفر از مرتعداران در شش سامان عرفی شهرستان قروه بودند که با استفاده از جدول مورگان تعداد نمونه در این تحقیق 196 نفر انتخاب شد. برای سنجش داده‌­ها از نرم افزار SPSS نسخه 22 استفاده شد. ابزار جمع‌­آوری اطلاعات در این تحقیق، پرسشنامه بود. برای تعیین روایی پرسشنامه از اساتید رشته­ مرتعداری و کارشناسان منابع طبیعی و به­‌منظور برآورد پایایی پرسشنامه از آزمون ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که کانال­های ملّی، محلّی و بین‌المللی با نگرش مرتعداران رابطه مثبت و معنی­دار دارند. به­علاوه؛ نتایج نشان داد که شاخص­های کانال­های ارتباطی و منابع اطلاعاتی قادر به تبیین 56 درصد از واریانس کل نگرش مرتعداران نسبت به اصلاح و احیای مراتع بودند. نتایج حاصل از تحقیق نشان می­دهد که با بهبود شاخص­های منابع و کانال­‌های ارتباطی و اطلاعاتی، نگرش مثبت و در نهایت مشارکت مرتعداران در اصلاح و احیای مراتع افزایش خواهد یافت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
جوامع محلی
کانال‌های بین‌المللی
کانال‌های محلّی
کانال‌های ملی
مرتعداران

عنوان مقاله English

The role of information and communication sources and channels of pastoralists in attitude towards the restoration and rehabilitation of rangelands (Case Study: Kurdistan province, city Qorveh)

نویسندگان English

F. Ahmadi 1
H. Mirzaee 2
E. Fathi 3
چکیده English

Information resources and communication channels, can Informing and notifying role, as an agent of change in knowledge, perception and attitude, the most important role to play in preventing the degradation of natural resources. The aim of this study was the role of pastoralists resources and communication channels in attitude towards the reform and rehabilitation of rangelands in the Qorveh city (Kurdistan), respectively. The population of 400 people were pastoralists who are using Morgan table, 196 individuals were selected in this study. For data evaluation SPSS version software was used 22. The data collected in this study was by a questionnaire. Was used to determine the validity of a panel of experts. In order to estimate the reliability of the test Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. To assess the relationship between independent variables (national channels, local channels and international channels) of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used. Also, to assess the relationship between independent variables and the dependent variable of the statements of each of Kendall's tau b rank correlation coefficient was used. The results showed that the national channels, local and international pastoralists attitude positive and significant relationship. Also, the findings demonstrate that local variable with the most channels and international channels with the lowest relative importance of the independent variables. In addition, results showed that the results of the study showed that the index of communication channels and information sources to account for 56% of the total variance of attitude towards the reform and rehabilitation of rangelands were pastoralists.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Local communication
international channels
local channels
national channels
pastoralists

  1. Adeogun, S.O., Olawoye, J.E., and Akinbile, L.A. 2010. Information sources to cocoa farmers on cocoa rehabilitation techniques (CRTs) in selected states of Nigeria. Journal Media and Communication Studies, 2(1): 9-17.

    1. Ahmadi, F., Heydari, Gh., And Shafiei, F. 2017. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Use of Producers from Information Resources and Communication Channels for Participation in Dehgolan's Rangeland Reclamation Projects. Iranian Natural Resources Journal, Range and Watershed Management, 70 (1): 31-41(In Persian).
    2. Albarracin, D., Johnson, B.T., and Zanna, M.P. 2014. The handbook of attitudes. Psychology Press, London, England, 840 P.
    3. Bedunah, D.J., and Angerer, J.P. 2012. Rangeland degradation, poverty and conflict: how can Rangeland scientists contribute to effective responses and solutions? Rangeland Ecology & Management, 65: 606-612.
    4. Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. 2008. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. (3th Ed.), Cambridge University (UK). 269 p.
    5. Blackstock, K. L., Ingram, J. Burton, R. Brown, K. M., and Slee, B. 2009. Understanding and influencing behavior change by farmers to improve water quality, Science of Total Environment. Science of the Total Environment, 20(2): 226–237.
    6. Bodin, O., and Crona, B.I. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?. Journal of Global Environmental Change, 19(3): 366-374. ‏
    7. Bohensky, E.L., Butler, J.R.A., and Mitchell, D. 2010. Scenarios for knowledge integration: exploring Ecotourism Futures in Milne Bay, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Marine Biology, 11: 504-518.
    8. Bustos, B., Folchi, M., and Fragkou, M. 2016. Coal mining on pastureland in Southern Chile; challenging recognition and participation as guarantees for environmental justice. Geoforum,‏ 22(3): 255-266.
    9. FAO, IFAD, WRP, 2013. The state of food insecurity in the world 2013: the multiple dimensions of food security. FAO, Rome, Italy. 56 pp.
    10. Fawole, O.P. 2008. Pineapple farmers' information sources and usage in Nigeria. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 14: 381-389.
    11. Gangadharappa, H.V, Pramod K.T.M., and Shiva, K.H.G. 2007. Gastric floating drug delivery systems: a review. Journal of Indian. Pharm. Education Reselts, 41: 295– 305.
    12. Gebauer, F., Vilimek, R., Keinath, A., and Carbon, C.C. 2016. Changing attitudes towards emobility by actively elaborating a fast-changing technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106: 31-36.
    13. Gross, J.E., McAllister, R.R.J., Abel N., Stafford Smith, M., and Maru, Y., 2006. Australian rangelands as complex adaptive systems: a conceptual model and preliminary results. Environmental Modeling and Software, 21: 1264-1272.
    14. Havstad, K.M., Peters, D.P.C., Skaggs, R., Brown, J., Bestelmeyer, B., Fredrickson, E., Herrick, J., and Wright, J. 2007. Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecolgycal and Econmic, 64: 261–268.
    15. Johny, J., Wichmann, B., and Swallow, B.M. 2017. Characterizing social networks and their effects on income diversification in rural Kerala, India. World Development, 94: 375-392. ‏
    16. Karimi, S., and something, M. 2007. Effect of Soil Conservation on Farmers in Ghare Chay Watershed in Markazi Province. Journal of Rural and Development, 273: 54-66 (In Persian).
    17. Kepe, T. 2008. Beyond the Numbers: Understanding the value of vegetation to rural livelihoods in Africa. Geoforum, 39: 958-968.
    18. Khedrigharibvand, H. 2018. Sustainable Rangeland Management in Iran: toward a policy-oriented decision- support model. Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 279 P.
    19. Khedrigharibvand, H., Azadi, H., Teklemariam, D., Ebrahimi, A., Ardali, E. O., Van Acker, V., and Witlox, F. 2019. Sustainable Rangeland Management in Southwest Iran: Understanding Changes in Experts’ Attitudes Toward Livelihood Alternatives, Rangeland Ecology & Management. ‏
    20. Khedrigharibvand, H., Azadi, H. and Witlox, F. 2015. Exploring Appropriate Livelihood Alternatives for sustainable rangeland management. The Rangeland Journal, 37 (4): 345-356 (In Persian).
    21. Klein, J.A., Fernández-Giménez, M.E., Wei, H., Changqing, Y., Du Ling, D.D., and Reid, R.S. 2011. A participatory framework for building resilient social-ecological pastoral systems. In: Fernández-Giménez, M.E. (Ed.), Restoring community connections to the land: building resilience through community-based rangeland management in China and Mongolia. CABI, Wallingford, UK. 3-36.
    22. Lennine, J. 2002. Rural Women`s Empowerment in a Communication Technology Project: Some contradictory effects. Rural Society, 3: 224- 245.
    23. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, 137 P.
    24. Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., and Chaplin, S. 2018. Understanding farmers’ motivations for providing unsubsidised environmental benefits. Land Use Policy, 76: 697-707. ‏
    25. Mirtorabi, M., Shafiei, F., and Rezvanfar, A. 2014. Study of Communication Channels and Information Resources Effective on Rural Management. Journal of Natural Resources, 10: 339-329 (In Persian).
    26. Narjisse, H. 2000. Rangeland issues and trends in developing countries. Rangeland desertification Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 181-195.
    27. Neely, C., Bunning, S. and Wilkes, A. 2009. Review of evidence on drylands pastoral systems and climate change: implications and opportunities for mitigation and adaptation. Land and Water Discussion Paper 8. Food and Agriculture Organziation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, 50 P.
    28. Oliveira, V. H., Anneberg, I., Voss, H., Sorensen, J. T. and Thomsen, P.T. 2019. Attitudes of Danish dairy farmers towards biosecurity. Livestock Science. ‏
    29. Opara, U.N. 2008. Agricultural information sources used by farmers in Imo State, Nigeria. Information Development, 24: (4): 289-295.
    30. Police station, h. 2012. Analyzing and processing data in socio-economic research. University of Tehran, 388 P.
    31. Rezvanfar, A and Sokhtanlo, M. 2007. Investigating the Variables Affecting Farmers' Relations in Iran. University of Tehran, 210 P (In Persian).
    32. Rigg, J. 2006. Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural south. World Development, 34(1): 180-202.
    33. Sabatini, F. 2009. Social capital as social networks: A new framework for measurement and empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38 (3): 429-442.
    34. Sarukhi, B. 2006. Methodology of research in social sciences, Vol.2 Trends & Techniques, Publications of Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies research center, 520 P )In Persian.(
    35. Savari, M., Milky, N and Asadi, A. 2013. Effects of communication channels and information resources on informing rural women. Rural Research Journal, 2: 311-332.
    36. Sayre, N.F., McAllister, R.R.J., Bestelmeyer, B.T., Moritz, M. and Turner, M.D. 2013. Earth stewardship of rangelands: coping with ecological, economic, and political marginality. Ecological and Environment, 11: 348–354.
    37. Scoones, I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Peasant Studies, 36(1): 71-96.
    38. Shariatzadeh, M., Rad Rad., J. and Siddiqui, H. 2011. Study of the Role of Education in Participatory Management in Rangelands. Journal of Forest and Range, 36: 90-100 )In Persian.(
    39. Sharma, U. 2003. Women Empowerment through Information Technology.
    40. Stafford Smith, M., Abel, N.O., Walker, B.H. and Chapin, F.S. 2009. Drylands: coping with uncertainty, thresholds, and changes in state. In: Chapin III, F.S., Kofin, G.P., Folke C. (Eds.), Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based Natural resource management in a changing world. Springer-Verlag, New York NY, USA, 171-195.
    41. United Nations. 2013. World population prospects: the 2012 revision, highlights and advance tables New York, NY, USA. Available at: http:// esa. un. Org/wpp/ Documentation/ pdf/ WPP 2012_HIGHLIGHTS.pdf: ESA/P/WP.228. United Nations, Department of Economicand Social Affairs, Population Division, 118 P.
    42. Windahl, S., Signitzer, B., and Olson, J.T. 2009. Using Communication Theory: An Introduction to Planned Communication. (2th Ed.), Sage Publication, 312 p.
    43. Yazdani, A., Bagherian, R., Kalateh Arifah, S., Nazari, L., and Barati, h. 2016. The effect of aquifers' knowledge and awareness on willingness to carry out collaborative projects (Case study: International Project for Corrosive Carbon in Esfarayn-North Khorasan). 11th National Conference on Watershed Management Sciences and Engineering, 46-49 (In Persian).