ارائه الگوی مدیریت جامع مبتنی بر شاخص‌های خدمات بوم‌سازگان در حوزه آبخیز زاینده‌رود.

نویسندگان
1 پژوهشگر پسادکتری دانشگاه یزد
2 استاد دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کویرشناسی، دانشگاه یزد
چکیده
حوزه آبخیز از بوم‌سازگان‌های مختلف تشکیل و به‌عنوان واحد انجام مطالعات مدیریت جامع در نظر گرفته می‌شود. مدیریت جامع با شناسایی فرآیندهای مخرب در جهت بهبود خدمات بوم‌سازگان عمل می‌کند. با توجه به فشار مضاعف بر بوم‌سازگان‌های مختلف و تخریب آن‌ها، کارشناسان و محققان در تلاش هستند به‌منظور حفظ بوم‌سازگان‌ها، یک الگوی مدیریتی جامع برای سلامت آبخیز‌ها ارائه دهند. از طرفی، بعضی از فشارهای وارد بر بوم‌سازگان‌ها در وضعیت کنونی قابل مشاهده است. اما تعدادی از فشارها هستند که به تازگی پدیدار می‌شوند و اثرات آن‌ها در وضعیت منابع طبیعی ممکن است مدت‌ها طول بکشد تا نمود پیدا کند. بنابراین شناسایی این فشارها و پیشران‌‌ها و اثرات آن‌ها برای ارائه راهکارهای عملیاتی بهینه ضروری است. در همین راستا، به‌منظور کاهش فشار و بهبود شرایط حوزه آبخیز زاینده‌رود طرح‌ها و مطالعات مختلفی صورت گرفته است. حوزه آبخیز زاینده‌رود در منطقه مرکزی ایران از مناطقی است که دارای مسئله ناپایداری منابع آب است. در واقع، تنش آبی و خسارات محیط‌زیستی جبران‌ناپذیری که به حوزه آبخیز زاینده‌رود و کشور وارد شده است، سلامت حوزه آبخیز را به خطر و انجام پژوهش حاضر را توجیه می‌کند. لذا، پژوهش حاضر با تبیین نقشه راه کلی، به دنبال بهبود وضعیت سلامت حوزه آبخیز زاینده‌رود و رسیدن به یک تصمیم مدیریتی مناسب است. در واقع، این الگو می‌تواند به‌عنوان هسته اصلی و الگوی بنیادی در مدیریت جامع حوزه‌های آبخیز به کار گرفته شود. اهداف و راهکارهای پیشنهادی، مسیر مدیریت درست در حوزه آبخیز زاینده‌رود را تعیین می‌کند. هم‌چنین، ذی‌نفعان می‌توانند با توجه به ترجیحات و شرایط موجود، اقدامات و فعالیت‌هایی را به‌صورت مشارکتی برنامه‌ریزی و اجرا نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting the integrated management model based on ecosystem service indicators in Zayandeh-roud watershed

نویسندگان English

zeinab karimi 1
A. Talebi 2
1 Postdoctoral researcher, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert Studies, Yazd University
چکیده English

The watershed is composed of various ecosystems and is considered a unit for conducting integrated management studies. Integrated management works to ecosystem services improve by identifying destructive processes. Due to the double pressure on the ecosystem different and their destruction, experts and researchers are trying to provide an integrated management model for watershed health in order to preserve ecosystems. On the other hand, some of the pressures on the ecosystem are visible in the current situation. But there are a number of pressures that are emerging recently and their effects on the state of natural resources may take a long time to appear. Therefore, identifying these pressures and drivers and their effects is essential to provide optimal operational solutions. In this regard, in order to reduce the pressure and improve the conditions of Zayandeh- roud watershed, various plans and studies have been done. Zayandeh- roud watershed in the central region of Iran is one of the regions that has the problem of water instability. In fact, water stress and irreparable environmental damage to the Zayandeh- roud watershed and the country, endanger the health watershed and justifies the present study. Therefore, the present study seeks to health status improve of Zayandeh- roud watershed by explaining the general roadmap and reach an appropriate management decision. In fact, this model can be used as the core and basic model in the integrated management of watersheds. The proposed goals and solutions, determine the correct management way in Zayandeh- roud watershed. Also, the stakeholders can, according to preferences and existing conditions, actions and activities can be planned and implemented in a participatory manner.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Integrated management model
Zayandeh- roud watershed
Ecosystem services
strategic
participatory approach
watershed health
  1. Ahn, S.R., and Kim S.J. 2017. Assessment of watershed health, vulnerability and resilience for determining protection and restoration Priorities. Environmental Modelling & Software.
  2. Alilou, H., Rahmati, O., Singh, V. P., Choubin, B., Pradhan, B., Keesstrag, S., Ghiasi, S.S., and Sadeghi, S.H.R. 2019. Evaluation of watershed health using Fuzzy-ANP approach considering geo-environmental and topo-hydrological criteria. Journal of environmental management. Feb 15; 232:22-36.
  3. Alvandi, E., and Sadoddin, A. 2019. Developing a Web-Based Integrated Bayesian Decision Support System for Environmental Problems in a Semi-Arid Watershed. Vahed berdi, developing a Web-Based Integrated Bayesian Decision Support System for Environmental Problems in a Semi-Arid Watershed.
  4. Babbar, M., Mukhopadhyay, S., Singh, V., and Piemontia, A. 2015. A web-based software tool for participatory optimization of conservation practices in watersheds. Environmental Modelling and Software. 69: 111-127.
  5. Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J., Hamilton, S., Hunt, R., Jakeman, A.J., and Pierce, S. 2019. Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities. Environmental Modelling and Software. 116: 40-56.
  6. Costanza, R., Arge, R., Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limberg, K., Naeem, S., Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., and Van Den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387: 253-260.
  7. Environment Protection Agency. 2012. Identifying and protecting Healthy Watersheds. EPA 841-B- 11-11-002.
  8. EPA, 2014. Wisconsin integrated assessment of watershed health. 111 p. available at: http:// www. epa.gov/ healthy watersheds.
  9. Guangwei, H. 2011. Long-term impacts of policy mismatch upon watershed health. Journal of River Basin Management, 9 (1): 79-84.
  10. Hazbavi, Z. Jantiene, B., Nunes, J.P. Keesstra, S.D., and Sadeghi, S.H.R. 2018. Changeability of reliability, resilience and vulnerability indicators with respect to drought patterns. Ecological Indicators 87: 196-208.
  11. Hazbavi, Z., Sadeghi, S.H.R. 2017. Watershed health characterization using reliability- resilience- vulnerability conceptual framework based on hydrological responses. Land Degradation and Development 28: 1528-1537.
  12. Heal, G.M., Barbier, E.B., Boyle, K.J. Covich, A.P., Gloss, S.P., Hershner, C.H., Hoehn, J.P., Pringle, C.M., Polasky, S. 13. Segerso, K. and Schrader- Frechette, K. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services. Toward Better Environmental Decision- Making. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
  13. Jafari, A., Keivan-behjou, F., and Mostafazadeh, R. 2017. Comparing the conditions of different ecosystem health components in Iiril watershed, Ardabil Province. Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal. 6 (16): 81-92.
  14. Jovanelly, T. J., Rodríguez-Montero, L., Sánchez-Gutiérrez, R., Mena-Rivera, L., and Thomas, D. 2020. Evaluating watershed health in Costa Rican national parks and protected areas. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 6 (5): 1-14.
  15. Kragt, M.E. 2009. A beginner’s guide to Bayesian network modeling for integrated catchment 773 management. Landscape Logic. Hobart, 22p.
  16. Lewison, R., Rudd, M., Al-hayek, W., Baldwin, C., Beger, M., Lieske, S., Jones, Ch., Satumanatpan, S., Junchompoo, Ch., and Hines, H. 2016. How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems, Environmental Science and Policy. 56: 110-119.
  17. Lu, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, Y., Su, H., Wang, P. Jenkins, A., Ferrier, R.C., Bailey, M., and Squire, G. 2015. Ecosystem health towards sustainability. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 1 (1): 2.
  18. Mallya, G., Hantush, M., and Govindaraju, R.S. 2018. Composite measures of watershed health from a water quality perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 214:104-124.
  19. Millennium Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 2005.
  20. Mircholi, F., and Sadeghi, S.H.R. 2018. Comparative analysis of watershed health and sustainability concepts (Technical Note). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 5 (2): 163- 168.
  21. Mtibaa, S., Hotta, N., and Irie, M. 2018. Analysis of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of best management practices for controlling sediment yield: A case study of the Joumine watershed, Tunisia, Science of the Total Environment. 617:1–16.
  22. Momenian, P., Nazarnejhad, H., Miryaghoubzadeh, M., and Mostafazadeh, R. 2018. Assessment and Prioritizing of Subwatersheds Based on Watershed Health Scores (Case Study: Ghotorchay, Khoy, West Azerbaijan). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 9 (17): 1- 13.
  23. Mosaffaie J., Salehpour Jam, A., Tabatabaei M.R. and Kousari M.R. 2021. Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework. Land Use Policy. 100.
  24. Murray-Rust, H., Sally, H., Salemi, H. R., and Mamanpoush, A. 2000. An overview of the hydrology of the Zayandeh Rud basin”. Iran-IWMI Collaborative Research Project, Research Paper no.3.
  25. Ranjan, P., Singh, A., Tomer, M., Lewandowski, A. and Prokopy, L. 2019. Lessons learned from using a decision-support tool for precision placement of conservation practices in six agricultural watersheds in the U.S. Midwest. Journal of Environmental Management. 239: 57-65.
  26. Rolia, E., Sutjiningsih, D., and Siswantining, T. 2021. Modeling Watershed Health Assessment for Five Watersheds in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Advances in Sciences Technology, and Engineering Systems Journal, 6: 1.
  27. Sadeghi, S.H.R., and Hazbavi, Z. 2018. Adaptive watershed management based on health and sustainability assessment. Collection of articles of the Third National Conference on Soil Conservation and Watershed Management, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute. 29 and 30 June 2018; 10 p.
  28. Sadeghi, S.H.R., Hazbavi, Z., and Gholamalifard, M. 2018. Interactive impacts of climatic, hydrologic and anthropogenic activities on watershed health. Science of the Total Environment.
  29. Sadeghi, S.H.R., Sadoddin, A., Asadi Nalivan., O. Hazbavi, Z., Zare, A., and Moayeri, M.h. 2020. Watershed health and sustainability (principles, approaches and assessment methods). Tarbiat Modares University Publications. 233 p.
  30. Salamat, V., and Najafinejad, A. 2014. Prioritization and protection of healthy watersheds using a multi-criteria decision-making approach in Golestan province (Case study: a number of Gorganrood and Qarahsu watersheds). National Conference on Water, Human, Earth, Isfahan ،https://civilica.com/doc/319015. Isfahan 6 September 2014, 10 p.
  31. Salehian, S., and Manshizadeh, R. 2018. Analysis of changes in groundwater resources in relation to the instability of water resources in Zayandehrood basin. Rainwater catchment systems, 5 (17): 15-24.
  32. Salemi, H. R., Mamanpoush, A., Miranzadeh, M., Akbari, M., Torabi, M., Toomanian, N., Murray- Rust, H., Droogers, P., Sally, H., and Gieske, A. 2000. Water management for sustainable irrigated agriculture in the Zayandeh Rud basin, Isfahan province, Iran”. Iran-IWMI Collaborative Research Project, Research Paper no.1.
  33. Sheikh, V., Sadoddin, A., Abdollahian, H., Zare, A., Asadi Nalivan, O., Alvandi, E., and Khosrvai, Gh. 2021. Analysis of potentials and limitations to attain an integrated management of watersheds (Case study: Goorsefid subwatershed of Hablrerud river basin). 17th Iranian Soil Science Congress and 4th National Conference on Farm Water Management. 18- 20 October, Karaj.
  34. Tsai, Y.W., Lin, J.Y., and Chen, Y.C. 2021. Establishment of the watershed health indicators and health check of reservoirs. Ecological Indicators, 127, p.107779.
  35. U.S. EPA. 2011. Healthy Watersheds Initiative- National Framework and Action Plan, EPA 814- R- 11- 005, 28p.
  36. Wang, B., Yu, F., Teng, Y., Cao, G., Zhao, D., and Zhao, M. 2022. A SEEC Model Based on the DPSIR Framework Approach for Watershed Ecological Security Risk Assessment: A Case Study in Northwest China. Water, 14(1): 106.
  37. Xu, H., Windsor, M., Muste, M. and Demir, I. 2020. A web-based decision support system for collaborative mitigation of multiple water-related hazards using serious gaming. Journal of Environmental Management. 255:109887.