ارزیابی کیفیت آب‌های زیرزمینی دشت یزدکان.

نویسندگان
مریم سادات جعفرزاده 1
علیرضا مقدمنیا 2
عطاءاله جودوی 3
آزاده احمدی 4
1 پژوهشگر پسا دکتری علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشگاه تهران.
2 گروه احیای مناطق خشک و کوهستانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران
3 هیئت علمی هیدروانفورماتیک، مرکز پژوهشی آب و محیط زیست شرق
4 هیئت علمی گروه مهندسی عمران آب، دانشکده فنی، دانشگاه اصفهان.
چکیده
منابع آب ناسالم و باکیفیت پایین با تأثیر بر روی سلامتی انسان، ممکن است منجر به بسیاری از بیماری‌های حاد و خطرناک شود. بنابراین مدیریت منابع آب خصوصاً آب‌های زیرزمینی که از منابع اصلی آب مصرفی در شهرها و روستاها می‌باشد، بسیار حائز اهمیت و توجه است. در مطالعه حاضر، داده‌های کیفیت آب‌های زیرزمینی دشت یزدکان جهت بررسی کیفیت حاضر آب‌های زیرزمینی در منطقه مطالعاتی، برای دوره دو دهه اخیر (1400- 1380) جمع‌آوری و موردبررسی قرار گرفت. به این منظور از روش‌های ترسیمی و شاخص‌های ارزیابی کیفی استفاده شد. طبق نتایج، کیفیت منابع آب زیرزمینی دشت یزدکان، با تیپ کلی ‌بی‌کربنات منیزیم، ازنظر TDS، در طبقه متوسط یا نامناسب برای شرب (بیش از 1000 میلی‌گرم بر لیتر) ارزیابی شد. بر اساس نمودار پایپر، خطر شوری زیاد مشاهده شد. بر اساس نمودار شولر نیز این آبخوان در کلاس "نامناسب و با طعم نامطبوع" قرارگرفته است. مقادیر شاخص‌های نفوذپذیری، کِلی، خطر منیزیم، نسبت جذب سدیم، درصد سدیم و باقیمانده کربنات سدیم نیز به ترتیب 48/1، 0/5، 77/7، 10-3×492، 28/6 و 3 محاسبه شدند که نشان‌دهنده خطر بالای منیزیم و باقیمانده کربنات سدیم بوده ولی ازنظر شاخص‌های نفوذپذیری، کِلی و درصد سدیم، در کلاس مناسب مشاهده گردید. با نظر به وضعیت نه‌چندان مناسب کیفیت آب‌های زیرزمینی این آبخوان، نیازمند برنامه‌ریزی دقیق در جهت پیشگیری از بدتر شدن وضعیت موجود و در مرحله بعدی ارائه راهکارهایی در جهت اصلاح کیفیت این آبخوان می‌باشد.
 
[1] Kelly`s index (Kelly`s ratio)
کلیدواژه‌ها
آبخوان یزدکان
روش‌های ترسیمی
شاخص‌های کیفی آب
کیفیت آبخوان
قره‌سو

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the groundwater quality in Yazdekan Plain

نویسندگان English

Maryam Sadat Jaafarzadeh 1
alireza moghaddamnia 2
Ataollah Joodavi 3
Azadeh Ahmadi 4
2 department of reclamation of arid and mountainous region, faculty of agriculture and natural resources, Tehran university, Iran
چکیده English

Unhealthy and low-quality water resources, by affecting human health, may lead to many acute and chronic diseases. Therefore, water resources management, especially groundwater, which is one of the main sources of water used in cities and villages, is very important. In the present study, groundwater quality data of Yazdekan plain were collected and analyzed to investigate the existing situation of the groundwater for the last two decade (2001-2021). For this purpose, graphical methods (Piper, Schuler, Durov and Stiff diagrams and anionic / cationic time series) and some of qualitative evaluation indices (permeability and Kelly indices, SAR and Magnesium Hazard, sodium percentage and sodium carbonate residue) were used. According to the results, the water type of the Yazdekan Plain groundwater, evaluated magnesium bicarbonate and according to the TDS amount, was evaluated as unsuitable for drinking. Based on the Piper diagram, high salinity was observed. According to Schuler's diagram, this aquifer is classified as "unsuitable for drinking". The values of the indices were calculated as PI:48.1, KI:0.5, MH:77.7, SAR:492×10-3, Na%:28.6 and RSC:3, which indicate the high risk of magnesium and sodium carbonate residue, but in terms of permeability, potassium and sodium percentage, was observed in the appropriate class. Considering the not very desirable condition of this aquifer quality, there is a need for detailed planning to prevent the deterioration of the existing situation and in the next step to provide solutions to improve the quality of this aquifer.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Aquifer quality assessment
Graphical methods
Water quality indices
Qarasu river
Yazdekan aquifer
  1. Ali, S. A., & Ali, U. 2018. Hadrochemical characteristics and spatial analysis of groundwater quality in parts of Bundelkhand Massif, India. Applied water science, 8(1), 1-15.
  2. Anbazhagan, S., & Jothibasu, A. 2016. Groundwater sustainability indicators in parts of Tiruppur and Coimbatore districts, Tamil Nadu. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 87, 161-168.
  3. Ansari, V. and Kerami, G. 2014. Hydrogeochemical investigation of the aquifer of Serow plain in West Azarbaijan province. National Congress of Irrigation and Drainage of Iran.
  4. Asgharai Moghaddam, A., Nadiri, A. A., & Sadeghi Aghdam, F. 2020. Investigation of hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater of Naqadeh plain aquifer and heavy metal pollution index (HPI). Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences, 29(115), 97-110.
  5. Doneen, L. D. 1964. Notes on water quality in agriculture. Department of Water Science and Engineering, University of California, Davis.
  6. Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. 1979. Ground water contamination. Groundwater. Ontario. Canada, 383-456.
  7. Harter, T. 2003. Groundwater quality and groundwater pollution.
  8. Hosseini, A., & pourmohammad, P. 2018. Investigation of Groundwater Quality in the Area of Irrigation and Drainage Networks for Agricultural and Drinking Purposes (Case Study: Dashteabas). Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering, 12 (40), 51- 59.
  9. Jaafarzadeh, M. S., Moghadamnia, A., Joodvi, A. and Ahmadi, A. 2023. Hydrogeochemical processes and assessment of groundwater quality in Valdian aquifer. The first crisis management event of strong Iran, Ministry of Energy, Tehran, Conference Center of National Museum of Islamic Revolution, 019371460IDME.
  10. Jalees, M. I., Farooq, M. U., Anis, M., Hussain, G., Iqbal, A., & Saleem, S. 2021. Hydrochemistry modelling: evaluation of groundwater quality deterioration due to anthropogenic activities in Lahore, Pakistan. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 3062-3076.
  11. Kelley, W. P. 1940. Permissible composition and concentration of irrigation water. In Proceedings of the American society of civil engineers (Vol. 66, pp. 607-613).
  12. Madene, E., Boufekane, A., Meddi, M., Busico, G., & Zghibi, A. 2022. Spatial analysis and mapping of the groundwater quality index for drinking and irrigation purpose in the alluvial aquifers of upper and middle Cheliff basin (north-west Algeria). Water Supply, 22(4), 4422-4444.
  13. Mahmoud, N., Zayed, O., & Petrusevski, B. 2022. Groundwater Quality of Drinking Water Wells in the West Bank, Palestine. Water, 14(3), 377.
  14. Mohammed, M. A., Szabó, N. P., & Szűcs, P. 2022. Multivariate statistical and hydrochemical approaches for evaluation of groundwater quality in north Bahri city-Sudan. Heliyon, 8(11), e11308.
  15. Naderi, K., Nadiri, A. A., Asghari Moghaddam, A., & Kord, M. 2018. A new approach to determine probable land subsidence areas (Case study: The Salmas plain aquifer). Iranian journal of Ecohydrology, 5(1), 85-97.
  16. Nagaraju, A., Muralidhar, P., & Sreedhar, Y. 2016. Hydrogeochemistry and Groundwater Quality Assessment of Rapur Area, Andhra Pradesh, South India. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 4, 88-99.
  17. Onwuka, O. S., Ezugwu, C. K., & Ifediegwu, S. I. 2019. Assessment of the impact of onsite sanitary sewage system and agricultural wastes on groundwater quality in Ikem and its environs, south-eastern Nigeria. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 3(1), 65-81.
  18. Ouyang, Y. 2012. Estimation of shallow groundwater discharge and nutrient load into a river. Ecological engineering, 38(1), 101-104.
  19. Qureshi, S. S., Channa, A., Memon, S. A., Khan, Q., Jamali, G. A., Panhwar, A., & Saleh, T. A. 2021. Assessment of physicochemical characteristics in groundwater quality parameters. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 24, 101877.
  20. Ravikumar, P., & Somashekar, R. K. 2013. A geochemical assessment of coastal groundwater quality in the Varahi River basin, Udupi District, Karnataka State, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(6), 1855-1870.
  21. Ravikumar, P., & Somashekar, R. K. 2017. Principal component analysis and hydro chemical facies characterization to evaluate groundwater quality in Varahi River basin, Karnataka state, India. Applied Water Science, 7(2), 745-755.
  22. Ravikumar, P., Somashekar, R. K., & Angami, M. 2011. Hydrochemistry and evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes in the Markandeya River basin, Belgaum District, Karnataka State, India. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 173(1), 459-487.
  23. Richards, A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils (U.S. Salinity Laboratory). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Hand Book, p 60
  24. Sabbaghzadeh, H., Khalki, M., Kavehkar, S., Yari, R., Zare, F., Javadi, S. 2018. Introduction of underground water indicators in determining the development and sustainability of water resources. The second national conference of applied research on water resources of Iran, Zanjan Province Regional Water Company, 10-1.
  25. Saikrishna, K., Purushotham, D., Sunitha, V., Reddy, Y. S., Linga, D., & Kumar, B. K. (2020). Data for the evaluation of groundwater quality using water quality index and regression analysis in parts of Nalgonda district, Telangana, Southern India. Data in brief, 32, 106235.
  26. Sarkar, M., Pal, S. C., & Islam, A. R. M. T. 2022. Groundwater quality assessment for safe drinking water and irrigation purposes in Malda district, Eastern India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(2), 52.
  27. Selvakumar, S., Ramkumar, K., Chandrasekar, N., Magesh, N. S., & Kaliraj, S. 2017. Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and irrigational use in the Southern Tiruchirappalli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Applied Water Science, 7, 411-420.
  28. Singh, U. V., Abhishek, A., Singh, K. P., Dhakate, R., & Singh, N. P. 2014. Groundwater quality appraisal and its hydrochemical characterization in Ghaziabad (a region of indo-gangetic plain), Uttar Pradesh, India. Applied Water Science, 4, 145-157.
  29. Tyagi, S., & Sarma, K. 2020. Qualitative assessment, geochemical characterization and corrosion-scaling potential of groundwater resources in Ghaziabad district of Uttar Pradesh, India. Groundwater for sustainable development, 10, 100370.