حکمرانی آب یا آبخیز در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
زینب کریمی
پژوهشگر پسادکتری دانشگاه یزد
10.22034/wmji.2024.2020720.1049
چکیده
هرگونه آسیب به منابع آبخیز می‌تواند اثرات و پیامدهای قابل‌توجهی برای گروداران داشته باشد. در این راستا؛ افزایش فشار و تنش بر بوم‌سازگان‌ها و بحران منابع آب در کشور بیش از آن‌که ناشی از فعالیت‌های غیر‌انسانی باشد، حاصل قوانین، سیاست‌ها و عدم مدیریت جامع در حوزه‌های آبخیز است. به‌منظور رهایی از این ورشکستگی، تصحیح اندیشه حکمرانی سابق و سلامت کیفیت حکمرانی در حوزه‌های آبخیز کشور ضروری است. از این‌رو، در این پژوهش سعی شده است که با بررسی حکمرانی نامطلوب منابع آب در کشور که در رقابتی با منافع کوتاه‌مدت به قیمت نابودی سرمایه‌های آبخیز در بلند‌مدت منجر شده است؛ دیدگاه مسئولان، متخصصان و گرودارن را به‌سوی حکمرانی شایسته آبخیز تغییر دهد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از آن است که این نوع حکمرانی برخلاف حکمرانی حاکم در کشور، با در نظر گرفتن تمامی اجزای آبخیز و دخیل کردن تمامی مسئولان و گروداران در جهت اصلاح و بهبود سلامت آبخیز تلاش می‌کند. ضمن اینکه، به بهانه تأمین و بازگردانی یک منبع در کوتاه‌مدت، سایر منابع آبخیز را در بلندمدت تحت‌فشار و نابودی قرار نمی‌دهد. در این راستا؛ پیشنهاد می‌شود برای بهبود و سلامت آبخیزها و رهایی از بحران‌های به وجود آمده در آبخیزها؛ حکمرانی شایسته آبخیز جایگزین حکمرانی نامطلوب غالب در کشور شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
حکمرانی آب
حکمرانی شایسته آبخیز
سلامت آبخیز
گروداران

عنوان مقاله English

Governance of water or watershed in Iran

نویسنده English

Zeinab Karimi
Postdoctoral researcher, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert Studies, Yazd University
چکیده English

Any damage to watershed resources can have significant effects and consequences for stakeholders. In this regard; increasing pressure and tension on ecosystems and the crisis of water resources in the country is the result of laws, policies and lack of integrated management in watersheds rather than being caused by inhumane activities. In order to getting out from this bankruptcy, is necessary to correcting the thought of the former governance and the quality of governance health in the country watersheds. Therefore; in this research has been tried to investigate the unfavorable governance of water resources in the country, which has led to the destruction of capitals in the long term in a competition with short-term benefits; to change the views of officials, experts and stakeholders towards the proper watershed governance. The findings of the research indicate that this type of governance, unlike the current governance in the country, tries to improve the watershed's health by considering all the watershed's components and involving all the officials and stakeholders. In addition, under the pretext of providing and restoring a resource in the short term, it does not put other watershed resources under pressure and destruction in the long term. In this regard; is suggested to improve the watersheds health and getting out of the crises that have occurred in the watersheds; the governance of IWM should replace the unfavorable governance prevailing in the country.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Proper watershed governance
Stakeholders
Water governance
Watershed health

  1. Afsari, A., Haji Naseri, S., Fazeli, M. and Feirahi, D. 2018. The grounded theory of the sociological investigation foundation of water governance in Urmia Lake crisis. Strategy Studies Public Policy, 7 (25): 53-72 (In Persian).

    1. Ahmadipour, Z. and Ahmadi, E. 2021. The analysis of the effective factor on the failure of water governance in Iran. The Macro and Strategic Policies, 8, Special Issue (In Persian).
    2. Akbari, M.R., Rezvanfar, A., Hosseini, S.M., Alambeigi, A. and Liaghat, A.M. 2020. Analysing intervention of the supreme council for water in water resources governance of Iran: An analysis based on enactments of supreme council for water (2010-2019). Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 5 (4): 9-31. (In Persian).
    3. Ashna, H. 2015. Water crisis and governance crisis. Shargh Newspaper (In Persian).
    4. Biniaz, M., and Tamassoki, E. 2023. Analyzing dimensions of integrity in the concept of Integrated Watershed Management in Iran. Integrated Watershed Management, 3(1): 38-53. (In Persian).
    5. Bonyad, L., Zareshahabadi, A. and Parsamehr, M. 2022. Pathology of water governance in Yazd. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development. 9 (3): 57-72. (In Persian).
    6. Davari, K. 2013. Where is the magic stick? Is there an immediate solution to the country's water problems? Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 2 (1) (In Persian).
    7. Crook B. J. and Decke, E. 2006. Factors affecting community-based natural resource use programs in Southern Africa. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 22 (3-4): 11.
    8. Fukuyama F. 2013. What is governance? Center for Global Development 1800 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036. Working Paper 314, January 2013.
    9. Ghasemi, A., Alavian, M. and Hosseini, M. 2022. Analysis of state-society interactions in Iranian water governance: Strategic implications. Quarterly of Political Strategic Studies, 11 (42): 181-219. 3058 (In Persian).
    10. García Quesada, M. 2011. Water and sanitation services in Europe: Do legal frameworks provide for Good Governance? UNESCO Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science, University of Dundee (United Kingdom), 10p.
    11. EPA 2021. Management summary of plan. Preparation of comprehensive plan to deal with dust and the action plan of related executive organizations. Assistance of human environment, national headquarters for deal with dust phenomenon, (In Persian).
    12. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 2021. National master plan of integrated watershed management, (In Persian).
    13. Iran water plan institute, 2015. Preliminary evaluation of the country water over nance, Two Edition, Tehran: Iran Water Plan Institute (In Persian).
    14. Karimi, Z. and Talebi, A. 2022a. Presenting the integrated management model based on ecosystem service indicators in Zayandeh-roud watershed. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 10 (37): 57-66. (In Persian).
    15. Karimi Z., and Talebi A. 2022b. Integrated land management or integrated watershed management?. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 10 (37): 1-6. (In Persian).
    16. Karimi, Z. and Talebi, A. 2023. An integration of remote sensing and the DPSIR framework to analyze the land-use changes in the future (Case study: Eskandari Watershed). ECOPERSIA, 11 (4): 319-336.
    17. Lautze, J. 2014. Key concepts in water resource management: A review and critical evaluation. New York, Routledge.
    18. Menarid. Introduce of Menarid, 2020. http://www.menarid.ir/fa/News/Detail/ About (In Persian).
    19. Mirnizami, S.J. 2021. Silent reallocation of water, strategic insight no. 4, Iran Water Management Think Tank, 8 pp.
    20. Mutekanga, F. 2012. Participatory policy development for integrated watershed management in Uganda’s highlands. PhD Thesis University of Wageningen.
    21. Noori Esfandiary, A. 2015. Evaluation of water governance in Iran, Shargh Newspaper. (In Persian).
    22. OECD. 2011. Water governance in OECD countries: A multi-level approach, OECD studies on water.
    23. Ontario, Conservation. Overview of integrated watershed management in Ontario. 2010.
    24. Oskouhi, M. and Esmaili, K. 2021. Analysis of governance theories and water resources management in Iran. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 8, 1-10. (In Persian).
    25. Rahimi, M., Malekian, A. and Alambeigi, A. 2021. Determining the mode and regime of the water governance in the face of environmental changes from the perspective of institution and local stakeholders. Journal of Range and Watershed Management 74 (1): 81-102 (In Persian).
    26. Research center, 2005. Water resource management and sustainable development. (In Persian).
    27. Rogers, P., Llamas, M.R. and Cortina L.M. 2005. Water crisis: Myth or reality? London, Taylor & Francis, 2005.
    28. Sustainable management plan of soil and water resources of Hablehroud. Introduce of sustainable management plan of soil and water resources of Hablehroud, 2021. http://www.hablehroud.ir/fa/News/Item/About (In Persian).
    29. Talebi Somehsaraie, M., Zareian, M.J., Farrokhnia, A. and Rozbahani, R. 2022. Investigating the evolution of water planning and policy in pre- and post- Islamic Revolution in Iran. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 14 (1) (In Persian).
    30. United Nation. 2006. Water: A shared responcibility. World water assissment programme berghahn books, 2.
    31. UNDP, 2012. Institutional and context analysis guidance note. Annual report. Oslo Governance Centre.
    32. United Nations University (UNU), 2017. Institute for water, environment and health, global water crisis, http://inweh.unu.edu/ wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/ Global- Water-Crisis-TheFacts.pdf.
    33. Urmia Lake restoration headquarters, 2021. https://www.ulrp.ir/fa (In Persian).
    34. Vahid, M. and Ranjbar, M. 2018. Pathology of the political dimension of water governance in Iran 1989-2013. Public Policymaking, 4 (4) (In Persian).
    35. Wittfogel, K. 2019. Oriental despotisms: A comparative study of total power, Translated by Mohsen Salasi, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Sales. (In Persian).
    36. World water council (WWC), 2000. Final report: Second world water forum (The Hague). World Water Council, Marseille.
    37. Yadegari, A., Yousefi, A. and Amini, A.M. 2018. Institutional analysis of water governance structure in the Zayande-Roud Basin. Iran-Water Resources Research (IR-WRR), 14 (1): 184-197 (In Persian).
    38. Zafirovski, M. 2005. Social exchange Theory under scrutiny: A positive critique of its economic-behaviorist formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7: 1-40.