تبیین و توسعه ساختارهای اداری، مالی و حقوقی با رویکرد ذینفع گرا برای مدیریت جامع حوزه آبخیز

نویسنده
استادیار، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، ایران
10.22034/wmji.2025.2060112.1114
چکیده
واکاوی مدیریت جامع حوزه آبخیز نشان می‌دهد جایگاه این بخش در سازمان منابع طبیعی اگرچه صحیح و علمی است اما ازنظر قدرت و انسجام سازمانی در میان سازمان‌های کم برخوردار به لحاظ قدرت سیاسی محسوب می‌شود. مدیریت جامع حوزه‌های آبخیز به‌عنوان رویکردی فراگیر در بهره‌برداری بهینه و پایدار از منابع طبیعی، نیازمند انسجام نهادی، مشارکت ذی‌نفعان و ساختارهای اداری و قانونی مؤثر است. پژوهش حاضر با تمرکز بر ساختارهای اداری، مالی و حقوقی مدیریت جامع حوزه آبخیز در ایران، نشان می‌دهد که ضعف در هماهنگی بین‌نهادی، جایگاه محدود سازمان‌های متولی و نبود چارچوب قانونی الزام‌آور از موانع اصلی تحقق اهداف این رویکرد به شمار می‌رود. از طریق تحلیل نهادهای موجود و بررسی ساختارهای پیشنهادی، نقش کلیدی شوراهای راهبردی در سطوح ملی، استانی و محلی و هم‌چنین ضرورت ظرفیت‌سازی در سطوح فردی، سازمانی و اجتماعی مورد تأکید قرارگرفته است. هم‌چنین، تخصیص بودجه مستقل و پایدار از دیگر الزامات بنیادین در مسیر تحقق IWM محسوب می‌شود. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که پیاده‌سازی موفق مدیریت جامع تنها از طریق رویکردی ذینفع‌گرا، ساختارمند و هماهنگ میان نهادهای اجرایی و جوامع محلی امکان‌پذیر خواهد بود. تحلیل ساختارهای اداری، مالی و حقوقی مرتبط با مدیریت جامع حوزه‌های آبخیز (IWM) در ایران نشان می‌دهد که تحقق اهداف این رویکرد نیازمند بازنگری و تحول بنیادین در شیوه حکمرانی و ساختار نهادی کشور است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Explanation and development of administrative, financial and legal structures with a stakeholder-oriented approach for IWM

نویسنده English

Omid Asadi Nalivan
Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran. o.asadi@maragheh.ac.ir
چکیده English

An examination of integrated watershed management (IWM) reveals that, despite its scientifically sound placement within the Natural Resources Organization, this sector lacks organizational power and coherence, rendering it politically marginalized. As a comprehensive approach to the optimal and sustainable utilization of natural resources, IWM requires institutional integration, stakeholder participation, and effective administrative, financial, and legal structures. This study, focusing on the administrative, financial, and legal frameworks of IWM in Iran, highlights key barriers such as weak inter-institutional coordination, the limited authority of responsible organizations, and the absence of binding legal frameworks. Through an analysis of existing institutions and proposed structures, the crucial role of strategic councils at national, provincial, and local levels is underscored, along with the necessity of capacity building across individual, organizational, and societal dimensions. Furthermore, the provision of independent and sustainable funding is identified as a fundamental requirement for effective implementation. The findings suggest that successful realization of IWM depends on a stakeholder-oriented, structured, and coordinated approach between executive bodies and local communities. Ultimately, the analysis indicates that achieving IWM objectives in Iran necessitates a fundamental revision and transformation in the country’s governance and institutional frameworks.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Capacity Building
Governance
Institutional Cohesion
Integrated watershed management
Stakeholder Participation
  1. Aaltonen, K. 2010. Stakeholder management in international projects. Helsinki University of Technology, PhD thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-3344-0.
  2. Akhmouch, A., and Clavreul D. 2016. Stakeholder Engagement for Inclusive Water Governance: “Practicing What We Preach” with the OECD Water Governance Initiative. Water 2016, 8(5): 204.
  3. Anthony, C.Ch. 2003. Integrated watershed management planning for Saint Lucia. PhD thesis, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department Macdonald Campus of McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 408 pages.
  4. Ashton, P.J. 2000. Integrated catchment management: balancing resource utilization and conservation. AWIRU Occasional. Pretoria: African Water Issues Research Unit, University of Pretoria. up.ac.za/academic/libarts/polsci/awiru.
  5. Athari, Z., Pezeshkirad, G., Abbasi, A., and Alibygi, A. 2016. Explaining a Model for Integrated Watershed Management in Iran. Geographical Planning of Space. 6(20): 209-226. (In Persian)
  6. Athari, Z., Pezeshkirad, G., Abbasi, A., and Alibygi, A. 2017. Challenges Facing Watershed Management in Iran by using Delphi Technique. Journal of Watershed Manage Res. 8(15), 268-279. (In Persian)
  7. Beheim, E., Rajwar, G.S., Haigh, M.G., and Kreek, J. 2010. Integrated Watershed Management Perspectives and Problems. Co published by Springer, with Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, 284pp.
  8. Bellamy, J., Ross, H., Ewing, S., and Meppem, T. 2002. Integrated catchment management: Learning from the Australian experience for the Murray-Darling Basin. Final report, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems. Canberra ACT 2601.
  9. Blomquist, W., and Schlager, E. 1999. Watershed management from the ground up: Political Science and the Explanation of Regional Governance Arrangements. Paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia. http://hdl.handle.net/10535/554
  10. Carr, G. 2015. Stakeholder and public participation in river basin management- an introduction. 2(4): 393–405.
  11. Darghouth, S., Ward, C., Gambarelli, G., Styger, E., and Roux, J. 2008. Watershed management approaches, policies, and operations: Lessons for scaling up. The World Bank, Washington DC. 164p.
  12. Deshpande, R. S., and Thimmaiah, G. 1999. Watershed development approach and experience of national watershed development programmer in the country. Journal Rural Development, 18: 453-469.
  13. 2004. Review and assessment of the status of watershed management. Watershed management case study: Latin America. Watershed Management and Sustainable Mountain Development Working Paper No. 3. Rome, FAO, FORC.
  14. Heathcote, I.W. Integrated Watershed Management: principles and practice (the 2nd Edition). John and Wiley, 464 P.
  15. Jakeman, A. J., and Letcher, R. A. 2003. Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Journal of Environmental Modelling and Software, 18: 491-501.
  16. Mosaffaie, J., Nikkami, D., Salehpourjam, A. 2019. Watershed management in Iran: history, evolution and future needs. Watershed Engineering and Management. 11(2): 283-300. (In Persian)
  17. Papzan, A., Alibygi, A., and Mirakzadeh, A. 2017. Explaining the role of local communities and stakeholders in organizing participatory watershed management. National Master Plan for Integrated Watershed Management. 240 p. (In Persian)
  18. Sadoddin, A., M. Ownegh, A. Najafinezhad, S.H.R. Sadeghi and A. Zare Garizi. 2018. Governance and planning of the river basin or watershed. 1st Symposium on Water Science and Environment Experts, Research Institute of the Ministry of Power, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
  19. Salehpour Jam, A. and Mosaffaie, J. 2023. Introducing the concept of a ladder of watershed management: A stimulus to promote watershed management approaches. Environmental Science & Policy, 147: 315-325.
  20. Sheikh, V., Najafinegad, A., and Mirghasemi, A. 2015. Review and comparative studies of national and global experiences and existing approaches in the dimensions of comprehensive watershed management. National Master Plan for Integrated Watershed Management. 287 p. (In Persian)
  21. World Bank in India. 2011. Lessons from Indian Watershed Management Projects. Available in web.worldbannk.org.