تأثیر احیاء مکانیکی مراتع بر ذخایر کربن و تنوع گیاهی (مطالعه موردی: حوزه آبخیز ارنگه)

نویسندگان
1 دکتری علوم مرتع، اداره کل منابع طبیعی استان البرز
2 استاد گروه علوم و مهندسی مرتع، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری
3 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی مرتع، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری
4 دکتری علوم مرتع، سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان مازندران
5 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای فیزیکی و منطقه‌ای دانشگاه گرانادا، اسپانیا
10.22034/wmji.2026.2080495.1135
چکیده
گیاهان با عمل فتوسنتز خود مسئول اولیه ورود کربن و تکمیل‌کننده چرخه ذخیره‌ای آن در اکوسیستم هستند. به نظر می‌رسد تفاوت‌ها در توانایی کمی و کیفی گیاهان در سطح پایه گیاهی و به‌تبع آن تنوع گیاهان در سطح جامعه گیاهی مهم‌ترین عامل تفاوت در توانایی جوامع گوناگون در ذخیره کربن باشد. هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی اثرات اقدامات آبخیزداری بر ارتباط بین ذخایر کربن و شاخص­‏های تنوع گونه­ای و کارکردی در حوزه آبخیز ارنگه استان البرز بود. اقدامات مکانیکی شامل سد گابیونی، سنگی ملاتی و کف بند ملاتی و یک سایت شاهد بودند. نمونه­برداری از پوشش گیاهی در فصل رویش به روش سیستماتیک- تصادفی در 400 پلات یک مترمربعی انجام ­گردید. در هر پلات ویژگی­های کارکردی گیاهان، زیست‌توده اندام­های هوایی و زیرزمینی اندازه­گیری و میزان ترسیب کربن آن‌ها و لاشبرگ محاسبه شد. در هر ترانسکت تعداد دو نمونه خاک از دو عمق، در مجموع 80 نمونه خاک برداشت گردید. شاخص­های تنوع گونه­ای و کارکردی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار Fdiversity محاسبه شد. برای بررسی ارتباط بین ذخایر کربن، شاخص­های تنوع گونه­ای و کارکردی از رگرسیون خطی چند متغیره در نرم­افزار R نسخه 3.1.1 استفاده شد. بیش‌ترین مقدار ذخیره کربن گیاهی و کل ترسیب کربن خاک در تیمار گابیون مشاهده گردید. شاخص‌های رائو، یکنواختی، شانون و تنوع کارکردی در کربن کل اکوسیستم تأثیرگذار بودند (0/003=p، 0/68=R2). بیش‌ترین ضریب تعیین (R2) آنالیز رگرسیون در تیمار سنگی ملاتی و کف­بند ملاتی مربوط به ترسیب کربن خاک به ترتیب به میزان 0/82 و 0/57 و در تیمار گابیون مربوط به کربن زیست‌توده به میزان 0/72 بود. در کل اثر فعالیت­های آبخیزداری بر ترسیب کربن تابعی از عوامل مدیریتی، شرایط اقلیمی، نوع عملیات احیایی و شرایط فیزیکی و بیولوژیکی خاک است و برای تعیین مؤثرترین عوامل، توصیه می‌شود داده­های دقیق با تکرار کافی، هم‌زمان با پروژه­های احیایی و اصلاحی تهیه گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Effect of mechanical restoration methods in rangelands on plant diversity and carbon storage (Case study: Arangeh watershed)

نویسندگان English

hamed farzi 1
Zeinab Jafarian 2
Reza Tamartash 3
Mohammadreza Tatian 3
Mansoureh Kargar 4
Jesús Rodrigo Comino 5
1 Ph.D. in Rangeland Science, Natural Resources Administration of Alborz Province
2 Professor in Rangeland engineering and science, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
3 Associate Professor in Rangeland engineering and science, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
4 PhD in Rangeland Science, Keshavarzi Jihad of Mazandaran province
5 Associate Professor in Departamento de Análisis Geográfico Regional y Geografía Física, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spai
چکیده English

Plants, through their photosynthesis, are primarily responsible for the entry of carbon and complete its storage cycle in the ecosystem. It seems that differences in the quantitative and qualitative ability of plants at the individual level and, consequently, plant diversity at the community level are the most important factors in the differences in the ability of different communities to store carbon. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of mechanical restoration methods on the relationship between carbon stocks and species and functional diversity indices in the Arangeh watershed of Alborz province. Mechanical methods included gabion chekdam, mortar rock dam, mortar embankment, and a control site. Vegetation sampling was carried out in 400 one-square-meter plots during the growing season using a systematic-random method. In each plot, were measured functional characteristics of plants, biomass of aerial and underground organs, and were calculated litter and their carbon sequestration. In each transect, two soil samples were collected from two depths, 80 soil samples totally. Species and functional diversity indices were calculated using Fdiversity software. To investigate the relationship between carbon stocks, species, and functional diversity indices, was used multivariate linear regression using R software version 3.1.1. The highest amount of plant carbon stock and total soil carbon sequestration was observed in the gabion treatment. Rao, evenness, Shannon, and functional diversity indices were influential in total ecosystem carbon (p=0.003, R2=0.68). The highest coefficient of determination (R2) of regression analysis in the mortar stone and mortar bed treatments related to soil carbon sequestration were 0.82 and 0.57, respectively, and in the gabion treatment related to biomass carbon was 0.72. Totally, the effect of watershed management activities on carbon sequestration is a function of management factors, climatic conditions, type of restoration operations, and physical and biological conditions of the soil. To determine the most effective factors, it is recommended to prepare accurate data with sufficient repetition, simultaneously with restoration and improvement projects.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Carbon sequestration
Gabion chekdam
Mortar rock dam
Mortar embankment
Ecosystem function
1. Catovsky, S., Bradford, M.A., and Hector, A. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity: implications for carbon storage. Oikos, 97: 443–448.
2. Conti, G., and Díaz, S. 2013. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 101: 18–28.
3. De Deyn, G.B., Cornelissen, J.H.C., and Bardgett, R.D. 2008. Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letter, 11: 516–531.
4. Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Grigulis, K., and Robson, T.M. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52): 20684-20689.
5. Dubuis, A. 2013. Predicting spatial patterns of plant biodiversity: from species to communities. Thesis Ph.D. University of Lausanne, 295 p.
6. Farokhzadeh, B., Ghasemi, B., Ataeian, B., and Akhzari, D. 2023. Effective Physiological parameters and some physicochemical parameters on soil organic carbon storage in Gonbad rangelands. Journal of Rangeland, 16(4): 846-859. (In Persian)
7. Farzi, H., Tamartash, R., Jafarian, Z., and Tatian, M.R. 2020. Effects of Biological treatments on plants' functional and Species Diversity Indices (Case study: Arange Watershed, Alborz). Journal of Rangeland, 14(1): 37-46. (In Persian)
8. Farzi, H., Tamartash, R., Jafarian, Z., and Tatian, M.R. 2019. Effects of Mechanical treatments on plants' functional and soil carbon sequestration (Case study: Arange Watershed, Alborz), The 14th National Watershed Science and Engineering Conference, July 25-26, 2018. Urmia University. (In Persian)
9. Fynn, A.J., Alvarez, P., Brown, J.R., George, M.R., Kustin, C., Laca, E.A., Oldfield, J.T., Schohr, T., Neely C.L., and Wong, C.P. 2010. Grassland Carbon Sequestration: Management, Policy and economics. Chapter IV. Soil carbon sequestration in United States rangelands. Integrated Crop Management, (11): 54- 104.
10. Jafarian, Z., Kargar, M., Tamartsh, R., and Alavi, S.A. 2019. Spatial distribution modelling of plant functional diversity in the mountain rangeland, north of Iran. Ecological indicator, 97: 231-238.
11. Jafarian, Z., and Ghorbani, Zh. 2023. Prediction of Soil Carbon Sequestration in Rangelands Based on Soil Sampling Depth and Elevation Using Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Rangeland, 17(2): 179- 194. (In Persian)
12. Joneidi Jafari, H., Azarnivand, H., Zare Chahouki, M., Jafari M., and Kargari, E. 2013. Effects of contour furrow on carbon sequestration and nitrogen fixation in Artemisia sieberi rangelands of Semnan province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 20 (2): 298-308. (In Persian)
13. Kohestani, N., Rastgar, Sh., Heydari, Gh., Shetaee Jouibary, Sh., and Amirnejad, H. 2021. Monitoring the spatial distribution of soil carbon sequestration for four decades based on changes in rangeland vegetation conditions (Case study: Noorrud watershed in Mazandaran province). Journal of Rangeland, 5(2): 344-356. (In Persian).
14. Liu, J., Wang, S.J., Morreale, R.L., Schneider, Z.G., and Li, G.L. 2023. Contributions of plant litter to soil microbial activity improvement and soil nutrient enhancement along with herb and shrub colonization expansions in an arid sandy land. Catena, 227:  Article 107098, 
15. McCarty, G.W., and Ritche, J.C. 2002. Impact of soil movement on carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems. Advances in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory, Measurements, and Monitoring Conference in Raleigh, North Carolina. Environment Pollution, 116(3): 423-30.
16. Mensah, S., Veldtman, R., Achille, E., Assogbadjo, R., Kakaï, G., and Seifert, T. 2016. Tree species diversity promotes aboveground carbon storage through functional diversity and functional dominance. Ecology Evolution, 6: 7546–7557.
17. Moghaddam, M.R. 2007 Rangeland and Rangeland. University of Tehran Press. 470 p. (In Persian)
18. Core Team, R. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna). 
19. Rossier, L. 2011. Predicting spatial patterns of functional traits. MSC Thesis. University of Lausanne, 44 p.
20. Rawat, M., and Arunachalam, K. 2019. Associations of plant functional diversity with carbon accumulation in a temperate forest ecosystem in the Indian Himalayas. Ecological Indicator, 98: 861–868.
21. Shahrokh, S., Suri, M., Motamedi, J., and Eftekhari, A. 2017. Effectiveness of Contour Faro operation on soil carbon sequestration and biomass of Mahabad Caliphs rangelands. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 24 (1): 98-109 (In Persian).
22. Souri, M., Mahdavi, K., and Tarverdizadeh Sancari, S. 2017. Effects of mechanical improvement treatments on vegetation performance: Case study: Silvana rangelands in West Azerbaijan province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 24 (2): 360-369. (In Persian)
23. Tahmasebi, P., Moradi, M., and Omidipour, R. 2017. Plant functional identity as the predictor of carbon storage in semi-arid ecosystems. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 10: 139–151.
24. Tahmourth, M., Jafari, M., Ahmadi, H., Azarnivand, H., and Nazari Samani, A. 2018. Quantitative evaluation of the effect of watershed management activities on carbon sequestration and storage in order to reduce climate change in Parrud watershed in Shahroud watershed, Eco Hydrology, 5 (1): 161-172. (In Persian)
25. Thompson, I., Mackey, B., McNulty, S., and Mosseler, A. 2009. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems.  Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series no. 43, 67 p.
26. Thorsson, J., and Svavarsdottir., K. 2013. Soil carbon sequestration: A component of ecological restoration. Soil Carbon Sequestration, for climate, food security, and ecosystem services. International conference. Reykjavík, Iceland, 27-29 May 2013. Book of Abstracts. Unpublished manuscript. 186 pp.
27. Yu, G., Lv, Z., and Liu, B. 2024. Functional diversity and carbon storage of plant community elevation patterns and carbon accumulation mechanisms in desert shrubland of Yanqi Hola Mountain, China. Ecological Indicator,158: 11379.
28. Zuo, X., Zhou, X., and Lv, P. 2016. Testing Associations of Plant Functional Diversity with Carbon and Nitrogen Storage along a Restoration Gradient of Sandy Grassland. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7:189. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00189.
29. Violle, C. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional. Oikos, 116: 882-892.
30. Wardle, D.A., and Zackrisson, O. 2005. Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties. Nature, 435:806–810.